Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Higgo's avatar

Great to have you back, Ferg. Honestly, I didn’t realise how much I’d missed your weekly dose of sanity until this one landed. The reminder that the West’s energy policy is built on wishful thinking and ESG theatre — while China quietly gets on with being pragmatic — was much needed. I was starting to feel like I was losing the plot… but nope, it’s just the world that’s upside down. Appreciate the clarity (and the slap of reality).

Expand full comment
Stephen Fossey's avatar

Projecting out to 2050 is a necessary exercise but one that should be treated with caution. Think back 25 years to the year 2000. Potential disruption going forward to 2050 includes geologic hydrogen, geothermal, nuclear fusion, maybe fission. But, the biggest changes are batteries where prices have been dropping sharply and perhaps superconducting materials. Things that are changing geometrically are difficult for people to appreciate/ comprehend. Thanks for a great post.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts